Frontpage Slideshow (version 2.0.0) - Copyright © 2006-2008 by JoomlaWorks
 

Articles & Research

Abstinence and Its Critics (pdf)

Governors' Letter Funding Continuation for Abstinence Education (pdf)

The Case for Maintaining Abstinence Education Funding by Katherine Bradley and Christine Kim (July 24, 2009)

Teen Abortion Trends Lower in States Accepting Abstinence Education Funding vs States that Reject Abstinence Education Funding (pdf)

Another Look at the Evidence: Abstinence and Comprehensive Sex Education in Our Schools (pdf)

Assessing the Evidence: Comparing the Research of Comprehensive Sex Education and Abstinence-Centered Education (ppt)

Most High School Students Choose Abstinence (pdf)

Pres Clinton and Pres Bush did not decrease Title X Comprehensive Sex Ed $$ and Pres Obama should not decrease abstinence- centered education $$ (pdf)

Exposure to Sexual Lyrics and Sexual Experience Among Urban Adolescents (pdf)

Changes in Formal Sex Education 1995-2002 (pdf)

Adolescent Sexual Debut and Later Delinquency (pdf)

Adolescents’ Perceptions of Factors....and Sexual Initiation (pdf)

Protective and Risk Factors Associated with Adolescent Boys’ Early Sexual Debut (pdf)

New Study Validates Effectiveness of Abstinence Education Print E-mail

Should Cause Congress to Rethink Their Elimination of Funding for the Approach

Washington, DC (February 1, 2010) — In the battle to discover what works to curb teen sexual activity, a study released today in the Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine reports important, positive outcomes for high-risk, African-American, middle school students. The study shows that a high-risk population of 6&7 graders receiving abstinence-centered education reduced sexual initiation, reduced the number of sexual partners (a crucial determinant in acquiring an STD), and further showed that abstinence instruction did not deter the use of condoms (a common charge brought by anti-abstinence critics). Of particular note, students were significantly less likely to initiate sex with the abstinence-centered approach than any other sex education strategy. “If we are serious about reaching teens with the skills they need to resist sexual activity, the findings supporting the effectiveness of abstinence education should not be ignored," stated Valerie Huber, Executive Director of the National Abstinence Education.

The study authors provide insight that these findings are important because the abstinence –centered approach is preferred in many communities throughout the country. “The need to provide American parents with choices regarding the type of sex education their children are offered not only respects local control but underscores the fact that abstinence-centered education is an important response to the complex issue of teen sex. Federal funding guidelines require all abstinence-centered education to be theory-based, medically accurate, and focused exclusively on health - the very tenets that describe the studied abstinence program,” added Huber.

Additional study commentary claims that Abstinence Education is the primary approach funded and promoted by the United States. But, according to Huber, “The reality is that under the Bush Administration, comprehensive sex education received four times the federal dollars as Abstinence Education and reached only 8% of teens. The Obama Administration completely eliminated abstinence education from the 2010 budget, a rash and imprudent decision that jeopardizes the sexual health of America’s youth. The positive outcomes of this study provide President Obama important data for his 2011 budget recommendation to Congress. We urge a crucial course adjustment in funding so that abstinence-centered education can continue to work to reach teens.”

Links to new articles:

» Washington Post
» LifeNews
» Associated Press
» WebMD

 

Videos

August 18, 2010



Abstinence Works - Whole Person health